Therefore, the more uncertain and dynamic the situation, the more proximate a strategic objective must be.
The proximate objective is guided by forecasts of the future, but the more uncertain the future, the more its essential logic is that of "taking a strong position and creating options", not of looking far ahead. Herbert Goldhamer's description of play between two chess masters vividly describes this dynamic of taking positions, creating options, and building advantage:
"Two masters trying to defeat each other in a chess game are, during a large part of the game, likely to be making moves that have no immediate end other than to "improve my position." One does not win a chess game by always selecting moves that are directly aimed at trying to mate the opponent or even at trying to win a particular piece. For the most part, the aim of a move is to find positions for one's pieces that (a) increase their mobility, that is, increase the options open to them a decrease the freedom of operation of the opponent's pieces; and (b) impose certain relatively stable patterns on the board that induce enduring strength for oneself and enduring weakness for the opponent. If and when sufficient positional advantages have been accumulated, they generally can be cashed in with greater or less ease by tactical maneuvers (combinations) against specific targets that are no longer defensible or only at terrible cost.
ACTION POINT: Look for ways to take strong positions and create options.
No comments:
Post a Comment